Home > For the Captain: Create an innovation culture > Sustaining the case for innovation

Sustaining the case for innovation

A few weeks ago I attended a meeting of Innovation Directors from many different industries, where we shared our experience of making the case for innovation and sustaining the investment with or without having to re-make the case every year. From those discussions, I took away a very simple model – a virtuous circle indeed – to sustain the case for investment in innovation. 

Step 1: get the basics right.
Using the concept of innovation horizons (where horizon 1 is development of the next generation of the same product, horizon 2 is development of a step-change product a few generations down the line, horizon 3 is creation of an entirely new concept), the first step is about making sure that you get horizon 1 right before you invest in horizon 2. With a good track record at horizon 1 developments, the leadership of the organization will naturally want to invest in horizon 2 and will accept – at least for a while – that it’s got to provide some breathing space for horizon 2 projects to come to fruition. Then, with horizon 2 successes, horizon 3 will gets its chance. 
Step 2: focus.
Without exception, participants were working with a predefined set of innovation themes, as opposed to allowing complete 360deg freedom in the ideas being selected for funding. Provided that those themes have been signed-off at a high level in the organization, the innovation team then benefits from the leadership feeling re-assured that the innovation investment is focused on what matters for business. 
Step 3: be transparent.
That statement is somewhat counter-intuitive. The instinct would be to keep the innovation projects as secret as possible to avoid ideas being stolen by the competition. But in practice, secret doesn’t work for at least two reasons:
  1. We live in a world where innovation is unlikely to happen by working 100% in-house. On the contrary, success is more likely to come from collaboration with a number of external partners. And within the organization, success is more likely to come from gradually creating buy-in and excitment, rather than surprising people at the end with a fully developed innovative product that will generate instant resistance to change.
  2. History of past innovations, such as the telephone, shows that when you have a brilliant idea it is generally not because you’re a genius, but because the idea is ‘in the air’. In a world where information travels at increasingly reckless speed, this is even more true today than in the age of Edison and Bell. So the recipe for success is to be the fastest, not the stealthiest.
Recognizing that secrecy is not going to get us very far, embracing transparency appears as an opportunity to create momentum for projects and to provide on-going re-assurance that the organization will see a return on its innovation investment.
Step 4: make innovation everyone’s business.
This much-used statement is sometimes wrongly interpreted as giving everybody their very own garage so that they can emerge from it one year later with a fully fledged Apple Computer. In fact, sustained innovation is more likely to be delivered through teamwork than by a lone genius. In a team, each individual has a different role. Think of sport or think of business, everyone has their own set of strengths and competences, which makes them good at something a not so good at something else. Making innovation everyone’s business is about making sure that everyone in the organization brings their specific talent at the right time in the innovation process. At its simplest, innovation being the product of creativity and execution, success will come from making innovation the business of those who are creative and those who bring disciplined execution. By harnessing everyone’s talent for the purpose of innovation, we increase chances of success. 
This, in turn, takes us back to step 1. Having enjoyed success in our first iteration of the cycle, we can then move to the next level of challenge, be it the next theme or the next horizon, without having to re-make the case for innovation. And with the right focus, transparency and teamwork, we’ll successfully go through another iteration of the virtuous cycle of innovation.
  1. July 13, 2012 at 13:52

    Takeaway: Along the three horizons of innovation, the requirements for human innovation capabilities change. While common I-shaped experts are predominant for exploiting the current business (Horizon 1), they need to be enriched by complementary skills for exploring activities (Horizon 2 and 3). More radical innovation requires structures enabling knowledge flows, rather than keeping knowledge stocks. Crucial human capabilities concern making novel connections of ideas, the ability to overcome myopia as well as the integration of different angles. In addition to conventional experts, more T-shaped innovators are crucial to bridge and connect domains. Moreover, they are supposed to have the skill to create new meanings by combining diverse perspectives and questioning the status quo.

  2. July 16, 2012 at 22:13

    Take maps, for example. Not so long ago, most maps were in 2D. These maps are typically simplified, making it easy to orient yourself in relation to stylized images of roads and blocks of buildings. Recently, digital map providers such as Google and Microsoft (Bing) have begun to offer maps in a “street view” 3D layout. These 3D maps allow users to actually see the height, shape and surfaces of objects such as buildings, which is useful when looking for a particular landmark.

  1. August 5, 2012 at 21:52

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: